Bioinformatics is the basis for unprecedented revolutionary discoveries in the Life Sciences field
Bioinformatics based research glue multidisciplinary teams as demonstrated in the study led by members of the SLU-Bioinformatics Centre, Uppsala, Sweden. The work clearly shows that discoveries at the genome level in one species can be translated to another using biobank material; in this case from dog samples to human material. http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006000
Selected references underlying the development of the B3Africa project
Abayomi A, Christoffels A, Grewal R, Karam LA, Rossouw C, Staunton C, et al. (2013). Challenges of biobanking in South Africa to facilitate indigenous research in an environment burdened with human immunodeficiency virus, tuberculosis, and emerging noncommunicable diseases. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 11(6):347–354.
- BiobankCloud (2016). Attacking the biobank bottleneck, accessed 18 January 2016.
- Caboux E, Plymoth A, Hainaut P, editors (2007). Common minimum technical standards and protocols for biological resource centres dedicated to cancer research. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC Working Group Report No. 2).
- Campbell LD, Betsou F, Garcia DL, Giri JG, Pitt KE, Pugh RS, et al. (2012). Development of the ISBER Best Practices for Repositories: Collection, storage, retrieval and distribution of biological materials for research. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 10(2):232–233.
- de Vries J, Tindana P, Littler K, Ramsay M, Rotimi C, Abayomi A, et al. (2015). The H3Africa policy framework: negotiating fairness in genomics. Trends in Genetics. 31(3):117–119.
- European Commission and Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2012). Biobanks for Europe: a challenge for governance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Fuxelius H, Bongcam E, Jaufeerally Y (2010). The contribution of the eBioKit to bioinformatics education in Southern Africa. journal. 16(1):29.
- Klingström T (2013). Biobanking in emerging countries. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 11(6): 329–330.
- Mendy M, Caboux E, Sylla BS, Dillner J, Chinquee JJ, Wild C; BCNet survey participants (2015). Infrastructure and facilities for human biobanking in low- and middle-income countries: a situation analysis. Pathobiology. 81(5–6):252–260.
- Müller H, Reihs R, Zatloukal K (2016). User experience and usability requirements for NGS workflows in clinical applications. In: Proceedings of the Medicon 2016 conference, Cyprus.
- Müller H, Reihs R, Zatloukal K, Jeanquartier F, Marino-Martinez R, van Enckevort D, et al. (2015). State-of-the-art and future challenges in the integration of biobank catalogues. In: Holzinger A, Ziefle M, Roecker C, editors. Smart Health Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS 8700. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; pp. 261–273.
- Norling M, Kihara A, Kemp S (2013). Web-based biobank system infrastructure monitoring using Python, Perl, and PHP. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 11(6):355–358.
- Reichel J (2015). Transparency in EU research governance? A case study on cross-border biobanking. In: Lind A-S, Reichel J, Österdahl I, editors. Information and law in transition – freedom of speech, the Internet, privacy and democracy in the 21st century. Stockholm: Liber; pp. 351–382.
- Ruffert M, Steinecke S (2011). The global administrative law of science. Series volume 228. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Swertz MA, Dijkstra M, Adamusiak T, van der Velde JK, Kanterakis A, Roos ET, et al. (2010). The MOLGENIS toolkit: rapid prototyping of biosoftware at the push of a button. BMC Bioinformatics. 11(Suppl 12):S12.
- Wenander H (2013). A toolbox for administrative law cooperation beyond the state. In: Lind A-S, Reichel J, editors. Administrative law beyond the state: Nordic perspectives. Leiden, Stockholm: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; Liber; pp. 47–74.